Compare this to your after screenshot:

Compare this to your after screenshot:
Apart from small distinctions like the web page number in the 1st image therefore the Address “poorlydrawnlines.com” within the 2nd, those two comics look more or less exactly the same, right? Wrong. The comic that is second various measurements (according to my web web browser settings – currently I’ve blown it as much as 24 ? 24 cm), its color colors vary (according to my monitor settings), light is mirrored differently off its area, it even glows by itself… to not ever point out the various feel and smell. Yet, many people will say both are exactly the same comic, “Stereotype” by Reza Farazmand.

Would Danto concur? Does he even think about two copies of the numerous to function as the work that is same of, two copies of a guide for example? He does, e.g. On p. 33:

I'm able to, as an example, burn off a duplicate associated with the book by which a poem is printed, however it is not even close to clear that in that way We have burned right off the poem, as it appears ordinary that though the web page had been damaged, the poem had not been; and even though it exists elsewhere, say an additional copy, the poem cannot simply be identical with this content. When it comes to exact same explanation, it is not identified because of the pages just burned. … Often sufficient poets and philosophers have actually looked at artworks as therefore just tenuously linked to their embodiments.

Doesn’t this contradict the focus Danto sets on “the means this content is presented” (see above)? Or does not he count himself among the list of “poets and philosophers” who dismiss the real as a type of an artwork? On p. 93-94 it looks like he does:

Cohen has expected that Duchamp’s work is maybe maybe not the urinal at all nevertheless the gesture of exhibiting it; as well as the motion, if it certainly may be the work, doesn't have surfaces that are gleaming speak of ….Read more